BIGFOOT
Skip · Shooter · 2017 · Early Access
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $19.99.
- Length
- 4h
- Value
- $5.00/hr
- Reviews
- 82% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when BIGFOOT is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 2 GB of memory, NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 or equivalent, 10 GB of storage. Windows only.
You are a Bigfoot hunter with an important mission: to put an end to rumours once and for all and prove to yourself that Bigfoot is not just a myth or an invention of the mind...
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $10.71, set in July 2017. It has been discounted 50 times in the 10 years tracked here, typically at 20 percent off, with about 7 weeks between sales. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 5 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 44 percent on value. It is pricier than 73 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 64 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Nuclear Nightmare ($6.99, scores 52) beats it on value, while it beats Backrooms Rec. ($6.99, scores 17).
35 of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written August 2024 to September 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 7 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 725 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 132 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 53 percent of the 2,550 reviews written there were positive, against 82 percent overall, and those are 14 percent of everything written about it.
The drop-off
25% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
121 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Not getting achievements on Steam nor the game. Gameplay very glitchy with playing ai bigfoot gets stuck in river multiple times.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
BIGFOOT scores 43/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/509980/bigfootThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 14, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.