Rampage Knights
Worth it · Roguelike · 2015
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $12.99.
- Length
- 6.9h
- Value
- $1.88/hr
- Reviews
- 93% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Rampage Knights is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, OpenGL 3.2 compatible, 154 MB of storage. Windows only.
Rampage Knights is a cooperative beat 'em up game mixed up with randomized dungeon crawling and exploration, which you can play alone or with a friend online.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
The lowest price on record is $2.99, set in November 2017. 71 discounts in the 12 years on record. They run about 60 percent off, roughly 7 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 7 weeks.
On value it sits in the top 14 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 60 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 87 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Streets of Rogue ($19.99, scores 90) beats it on value, while it beats Lost Castle 2 ($12.59, scores 47).
80 from critics against 93 percent from players, and the player number comes from people who own the game.
None of the 348 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written March 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 60 percent of the 169 reviews written there were positive, against 93 percent overall, and those are 8 percent of everything written about it.
HowLongToBeat players log 6.9 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 67, 9.7 times as much.
The drop-off
78% start to 4% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
4 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
My brother and I 100%ed this game out pure joy. Wish the developers release a sequel.
A masterpiece of a game. Funny, challenging, entertaining, with huge replayability.
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Rampage Knights scores 78/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/314410/rampage-knightsThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 21, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.