Tom Clancy’s The Division™
Skip · Shooter · 2016
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
SKIP IT.
The value isn't there at $2.99.
- Length
- 24.2h
- Value
- $0.12/hr
- Reviews
- 71% positive
Recent reviews trending up: 79% over the last 30 days against 71% all-time.
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Tom Clancy’s The Division™ is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 6 GB of memory, 40 GB of storage. Windows only.
A tactical open world third-person shooter set in New York after a deadly pandemic. Team up or go solo to restore order against deadly factions, secure loot, and conquer high-risk endgame challenges.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $2.99. That was February 2026. Its cuts run 70 percent off as a rule. There have been 79 in the 11 years tracked, about 6 weeks apart. Today's $2.99 at 90 percent off matches the lowest price in the record.
At full price it scores 27. The current cut is what makes it a 30.
It is pricier than 89 percent of its genre, and less well reviewed than 67 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Tom Clancy’s The Division® 2 ($2.99, scores 49) beats it on value, while it beats OUTRIDERS ($19.99, scores 20).
Players rate it 71 percent positive over its lifetime, and the last 30 days run 79 percent. It is aging into a better game than its average suggests. Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 14 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written February 2026 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 35 percent of the 4,044 reviews written there were positive, against 71 percent overall, and those are 5 percent of everything written about it.
24.2 hours to finish it, 86 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 3.5 times the campaign.
It came out 10 years ago and 774 were still playing it at the last check.
The drop-off
11% start to <1% rarestNo achievement in this game marks the ending, so there is no finish rate. The curve runs from the most-unlocked achievement to the rarest, and its shape is where players stop. Steam global achievements
Players
774 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
for those who are looking for shooting game but with deeper mechanics and storyline.... this is one of those game that you must play at least once
invested alot of hours into this game on uplay its definitely enjoyable and the expensions aswell its worth the price considering how many still play this in 2026
One of the most third class possible games from Ubisoft. Uninstalled it right after within less than 24 hours!
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: critic score (Metacritic).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Tom Clancy’s The Division™ scores 30/100 on the BANG Score (a skip). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/365590/tom-clancy-s-the-divisionThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 11, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.