Hunt: Showdown 1896

Hunt: Showdown 1896

Skip · Multiplayer · 2019

Steam Deck Playable

The verdict

SKIP IT.

Winter Sale 2026 Dec 17
cut in 8 of 8 sales

It scores 33, under the fair line, at $29.99.

Cost per hour
$0.54/hr
Reviews▼
74% of 280,996
Critics
81 players 7 lower
Genre rank
Top 39% Multiplayer

Holding it back: Monetization, Reviews

Why
Reviews or length hold it below the tiers even at a deep discount.

Recent reviews trending down: 58% over the last 30 days against 74% all-time.

Watch this gameOne alert at a price you pick.

Time and effort

Typical playtime
55.8h
To 100%
630.8h 11.3x the story
Achievements
36

Price and sales

Sales
84 on record
Typical cut
50% off
Steam low
$11.99 June 2026
Sale every
35d last October 2026
Lowest now $28.79 at Fanaticalall-time low $10.76 on IsThereAnyDeal

Players and genre

Online
14,554 now
Recent reviews
58% 30 days
Cheaper than
3% of its genre
Better reviewed
58% of its genre
Price and player charts

The drop-off

69% start to 2% rarest
050100rarestfirst achievement

A game like this has no single ending, so its score does not use the finish rate. The curve shows where players stop. Steam global achievements

The value story

The value story

It has been discounted 84 times in the 9 years tracked here. The median cut across all of them is 50 percent, about 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price, and its last discount ended 5 days ago.

Against its own genre its score lands in the top 39 percent. It is pricier than 97 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon® Wildlands ($49.99, scores 43) beats it on value, while it beats Marauders ($29.99, scores 19).

More about Hunt: Showdown 1896

Players rate it 74 percent positive over its lifetime, but the last 30 days run 58 percent. Something recent has soured the room. Of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 8 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written September 2026 to October 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 46 percent of the 7,452 reviews written there were positive, against 74 percent overall, and those are 3 percent of everything written about it. It sells extras on top of the sticker price (cosmetic, currency); the score docks it lightly for that.

HowLongToBeat players log 55.8 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 631, 11 times as much.

280,996 reviews stand behind that percentage.

Buy now or wait

Buy now or wait

Discounted in each of its last 8 seasonal sales. Last discount ended 5 days ago.

Next sale
Winter Sale, Dec 17 to Jan 4

Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.

What drives the score

Grades: S best, D weakest

S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work

Raising the score
Reach15M+ owners
How many own it and play it, by SteamSpy's estimates (an old snapshot), the biggest driver for a game with no ending
Holding it back
Reviews
Gates the score. Weak reviews cap it, and nothing reaches BANGER without strong ones
MonetizationCosmetic, Currency, Free-to-grind, Unlock
Loot boxes / pay-to-win drag the score down
Recent reviews58% (30 days)
Trending down vs lifetime, a small dip
For context
Refunds8 of 800 reviews
Steam-purchase reviews sampled whose writer refunded the game. Nothing is docked
AI contentNone disclosed
From the developer's own Steam disclosure. No disclosure is not proof of none, so it does not move the score
In-app purchasesCosmetic, Currency, Free-to-grind, UnlockPCGamingWiki

What players say

The MMR system is terrible, and the overall matchmaking experience is frustrating. EU servers are flooded with russian players abusing high ping to gain an unfair advantage, obvious tool assisted Players seem to be standard in high elo while streaming ts. Competitive matches feel unfair and increasingly pointless when you have to deal with this questionable matchmaking. I cannot recommend this game to anyone...
Cold-WarNot recommendedafter 270hOct 2026Read on Steam
2 more reviews, 1 not recommended
if you want to play casual then you will have fun in this game, if you get pushed into 6 stars it will be a sweat swamp with many of your matches containing at least one cheater with walls, some type of aim cheat, amongst others. Crytek openly discourages "witch hunting" as a way to keep quiet the true scope of Cheating. In game reports do next to nothing and video evidence to their website rarely brings bans.
yoloswagger3333Not recommendedafter 390hOct 2026Read on Steam
virtual environment that truly plays upon the strings of your nervous system - rare experience nowadays
rorusuranRecommendedafter 220hOct 2026Read on Steam

Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.

About the game

Hunt: Showdown 1896 is the brutally rewarding extraction shooter. Track twisted monsters and overcome ruthless PvP. Take bounties in corrupted backwaters lost to history. With a team, you might survive. Die with nothing or get out with everything.
Description from the Steam store page.
Minimum specs

Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, NVIDIA GTX 1650 Super or AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT, with a minimum of 4GB of VRAM, 75 GB of storage. Windows only.

Cite this score

BANG Score badge
Hunt: Showdown 1896 scores 33/100 on the BANG Score (a skip) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/594650/hunt-showdown-1896
Embed the live badge

Reviews set the ceiling, and the size of the player base moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Nov 3, price as of Nov 7. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.

Critics vs players-7
Critics81
Players74
Metacritic critics · 280,996 Steam player reviews

Details

DeveloperCrytek
PublisherCrytek
GenreMultiplayer
Released2019
Players15.0Mowners, SteamSpy estimate
Achievements36