Assetto Corsa Competizione
BANGER · Strategy · 2019
Steam Deck PlayableThe verdict
BUY IT.
A BANGER at $9.99.
- Length
- 13.4h
- Value
- $0.75/hr
- Reviews
- 93% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Assetto Corsa Competizione is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 4 GB of memory, GeForce GTX 750 4GB, Radeon RX 460 4GB, 50 GB of storage. Windows only.
Assetto Corsa Competizione, the official GT World Challenge videogame. Thanks to the extraordinary quality of simulation, you will experience the atmosphere of the GT3 championship. Compete against official drivers, teams, cars and official circuits reproduced to the highest quality ever seen.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $3.99. That was June 2026. It has been discounted 63 times in the 8 years tracked here, typically at 70 percent off, with about 5 weeks between sales. Today's $9.99 at 75 percent off still sits 150 percent above the floor, so a deeper cut exists in its history.
Value puts it in the top 1 percent of the games it competes with. It is pricier than 99 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 97 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Assetto Corsa ($4.99, scores 89) beats it on value, while it beats RaceRoom Racing Experience (free, scores 44).
The math says it holds its tier up to $72.53, and you are being asked for $9.99.
77 from critics against 93 percent from players, and the player number comes from people who own the game.
This site sampled 800 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 45 were written by buyers who refunded it, sampled from reviews written June 2025 to August 2026. That is more refunded reviewers than 9 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 2,864 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 292 have a larger share. The typical game sits near 5 in 1,000, so the score docks it. 5 of the 45 refunded reviewers were past Valve's two-hour window when they wrote the review. Inside the two-hour refund window, 68 percent of the 2,372 reviews written there were positive, against 93 percent overall, and those are 7 percent of everything written about it.
13.4 hours to finish it, 336 to exhaust it. The completionist tail is 25 times the campaign.
7 years after release it still had 1.5K people in it at once.
Players
1,479 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Playing with controller, a bit too fast input, but after some time you can adapt to it. Overall really cool and simple racing game simulator. And extra credits to the realism sound, expecialy the straight cut gears
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Assetto Corsa Competizione scores 88/100 on the BANG Score (a BANGER). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/805550/assetto-corsa-competizioneThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Aug 1, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.