
TRON 2.0
Worth it · Shooter · 2014
Steam Deck UnsupportedThe verdict
BUY IT.
Worth it at $9.99.
- Length
- 11.8h
- Value
- $0.85/hr
- Reviews
- 91% positive
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when TRON 2.0 is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 256 MB of memory, 32MB Direct3D compatible Video Card with Hardware T&L and 32-bit color, 2.4 GB of storage. Windows only.
Over 35 levels of challenging gameplay -- Race at the speed of light, fight off computer Viruses and engage in violent digital combat.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $2.49. That was November 2015. Its cuts run 75 percent off as a rule. There have been 47 in the 12 years tracked, about 12 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 13 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 12 weeks.
Against its own genre it lands in the top 7 percent on value. It is better reviewed than 84 percent of its genre. Among the games that feel like it, Deus Ex: Human Revolution - Director's Cut ($1.99, scores 89) beats it on value, while it beats System Shock: Enhanced Edition ($1.99, scores 68).
This site sampled 328 of its Steam-purchase reviews; 1 was written by a buyer who refunded it, sampled from reviews written May 2020 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 76 percent of the 189 reviews written there were positive, against 91 percent overall, and those are 26 percent of everything written about it.
Players
1 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
Still the best TRON game ever. Also, this should have been TRON Legacy and not that stupid movie we got.
I already am a hug fan of the TRON games and mostly the movies, if you are a sucker for the 82 film then this is the game for you! It has very good mechanics and gameplay, the story is very easy to fallow, the lightcycle battles feel straight out of the classic film, and the disc system for the combat feels great! I do say if you're a casual gamer who mostly play slow-paced games then this might not be the game for...
First got this game from Half-Price Books back in 2005. Since then I've purchased the game a dozen times in physical and various re-releases, even bought an original xbox purely to check out the console port. The visuals are great, the music is great, the story is interesting, and the gameplay has aged quite well and is still a lot of fun! It was well worth the $25 back in 2005, it's well worth the $10 for Steam or...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
No data upstream: achievement curve (Steam global achievements).
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
TRON 2.0 scores 80/100 on the BANG Score (worth it). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/327740/tron-2-0The BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 22, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.