
Monster Hunter: World
Worth it · Action · 2018
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
WAIT.
Worth it today. The Winter Sale opens Dec 17, and it was discounted in 6 of its last 8 seasonal sales; 67% in the Winter Sale 2025.
Today
$29.99Worth it
Typical seasonal cut
$9.8967% offWorth it
- Cost per hourS
- $0.64/hr
- ReviewsA
- 89% of 520,394
- Critics
- 88 players 1 higher
- Genre rank
- Top 1% Action
Why
Watch this gameOne alert at $9.89 or less.
Time and effort
- Main story
- 46.6h
- To 100%
- 434.5h 9.3x the story
- Achievements
- 100
Price and sales
- Sales
- 75 on record
- Typical cut
- 50% off
- Steam low
- $7.79 April 2026
- Sale every
- 42d last October 2026
Players and genre
- Online
- 6,662 now
- Recent reviews
- 89% 30 days
- Cheaper than
- 2% of its genre
- Better reviewed
- 95% of its genre
Price and player charts
The drop-off
97% start to 1% rarestThis site could not identify an ending achievement for this game, so there is no finish rate. Steam global achievements
The value story
The value story
It has been discounted 75 times in the 8 years tracked here. The median cut across all of them is 50 percent, about 6 weeks apart. Today it is at full price, and its last discount ended about 4 weeks ago.
Its score sits in the top 1 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 98 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 95 percent. Among the games that feel like it, ELDEN RING ($59.99, scores 84) beats it on value, while it beats DARK SOULS™ III ($59.99, scores 77).
More about Monster Hunter: World
8 of the 800 Steam-purchase reviews sampled here come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written July 2026 to October 2026. That is fewer refunded reviewers than 7 in 10 paid games this site has sampled to the same depth, and among the 2,368 games in its genre sampled this deeply, 1,920 have a larger share. Inside the two-hour refund window, 49 percent of the 5,001 reviews written there were positive, against 89 percent overall, and those are 2 percent of everything written about it.
The main story runs 46.6 hours. Doing everything runs 435, 9.3 times as long.
The rating rests on 520,394 reviews, so it is not going to move much from here.
Valve rates it Steam Deck Verified, so it runs on the handheld without fiddling.
Buy now or wait
Buy now or wait
Last discount ended 31 days ago.
Sources: IsThereAnyDeal, Valve.
What drives the score
Grades: S best, D weakest
S is the best grade and D the weakest, judged as a buyer. ▲ raises the score, ▼ lowers it, ? is an input we do not have, • is a fact this genre's score does not use. How the grades work
What players say
great game, played 200 hours in ps4 and bought it again just bcs i wanted to play it on pc, cool game
2 more reviews, 1 not recommended
Easily the best Monster Hunter so far. It was my gateway into the franchise, bringing me endless joy and unforgettable friendships.
Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync Unable to sync...
Steam reviews, mixed to its ratio and rotated daily. Opinions are theirs.
About the game
Welcome to a new world! In Monster Hunter: World, the latest installment in the series, you can enjoy the ultimate hunting experience, using everything at your disposal to hunt monsters in a new world teeming with surprises and excitement.
Minimum specs
Minimum on the Steam store: 8 GB of memory, 52 GB of storage. Windows only.
Cite this score
Monster Hunter: World scores 80/100 on the BANG Score (worth it) as of Nov 8, 2026. The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/582010/monster-hunter-worldReviews set the ceiling, and price against real length moves the BANG Score inside it. How it works, and where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Nov 3, price as of Nov 7. A number here look wrong? Tell me and I will check the inputs.
