Coromon
Fair · Multiplayer · 2022
Steam Deck VerifiedThe verdict
NO RUSH.
Fair at $19.99. Buy it if you want it.
- Length
- 24.8h
- Value
- $0.81/hr
- Reviews
- 84% positive
Recent reviews trending down: 73% over the last 30 days against 84% all-time.
Watch this gameOne email when it is worth buying. Your call on what that means.
Get one email when Coromon is worth buying.
One email per game. Unsubscribe in a click.
Minimum on the Steam store: 1 GB of memory, OpenGL 2.1 or higher, 2 GB of storage. Runs on Windows, macOS.
Embark on a complete 30+ hour monster-taming RPG adventure, now remastered for PC! Catch and train more than 120 Coromon, explore six diverse biomes, and master strategic turn-based battles as you unravel a mystery that could change Velua forever.
What drives the score
How to read this
Every input gets a grade, S to D, read from the buyer's side. The score is multiplicative, so an input only counts as raising when it sits near the top of its own scale. Anything with real room left is holding the score back, because that room is the gap to 100. ▲ marks a lift, ▼ a drag or a dock, ? an input we do not have, • a fact this genre's score does not use. The exact weights stay secret.
The value story
It has never been cheaper than $2.99. That was February 2025. Its cuts run 60 percent off as a rule. There have been 44 in the 4 years tracked, about 5 weeks apart. Today it is at full price. The last sale was about 5 weeks ago, and on this game's rhythm the next one tends to arrive within 5 weeks.
On value it sits in the top 6 percent of its genre. It is pricier than 88 percent of its genre, and better reviewed than 90 percent. Among the games that feel like it, Monster Sanctuary ($4.99, scores 85) beats it on value, while it beats Monster Hunter Stories 2: Wings of Ruin ($39.99, scores 58).
Critics scored it 73. Players sit 11 points higher at 84 percent, which usually means a game that plays better than it reviews.
Players rate it 84 percent positive over its lifetime, but the last 30 days run 73 percent. Something recent has soured the room. Of the 600 Steam-purchase reviews this site sampled, 7 come from buyers who refunded the game, sampled from reviews written July 2023 to September 2026. Inside the two-hour refund window, 70 percent of the 548 reviews written there were positive, against 84 percent overall, and those are 9 percent of everything written about it.
HowLongToBeat players log 24.8 hours as a typical playtime, and completionists log 50, 2.0 times as much.
Valve rates it Steam Deck Verified, so it runs on the handheld without fiddling.
The drop-off
68% start to 7% finishMost players never reach the end. On a 24.8-hour game, that's a lot you pay for and may never use. Steam global achievements
Players
250 players at peak in the last day.
The chart appears once this game has been counted more than once.Player counts via SteamSpy.
What players say
The mini games like the jump rope dojo game made me call it quits. I don't see how you can add mini games that overtuned with no room for error to main quests and block progression for some. The frustration wasn't worth it for me.
I expected a pokemon clone with a fun fan twist. I got the fan twist, I didn't get the fun part. Its heavily focused towards experienced players and expects you to prepare for a challenge/grind unless you're playing on the story mode. I was really enjoying the side quest content and there were unique gadgets to help someone optimize their team, but the moment it forced me to grind for an hour to get past 1 of almost...
Player reviews from Steam: the most helpful all-time, plus the newest that clear the same quality bar, with the hours each player had put in when they wrote it. The mix of Recommended and Not recommended follows the game's Steam ratio. Rotates daily. Opinions are theirs.
Cite this score
Embed the live badge, copy the line, or download the card.
Coromon scores 64/100 on the BANG Score (fair value). The BANG Score rates what a game is worth for the money. Via Steam BANGERS. https://steambangers.com/game/1218210/coromonThe BANG Score is one number for value, 0 to 100: price against how it reviews and how long it was built to be. It answers the money question and stops there; whether the game is for you is still your call.
Reviews set the ceiling and price moves you inside it, so a cheap game that reviews badly cannot climb. Ratings from few reviewers are shrunk toward the middle, so 100 percent from nine people does not outrank 96 percent from ninety thousand. Length comes from HowLongToBeat where it can be matched, measured against a per-genre floor so a five-hour narrative game is judged against other narrative games rather than against a sixty-hour RPG. Where no verified length exists the score says so and carries a dock, because the biggest input is then a guess. The full method, including where it is weak → Steam reviews as of Sep 18, price as of Sep 24.
A number here look wrong? Tell me what it got wrong and I will look at the inputs behind it.